AMRESH KUMAR SINGH, N.N.MATHUR
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Jain Construction Co. , Barmer – Respondent
(i). Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in its interpretation of Sec. 40 (b) of the Income Tax Act and then holding that the claim of the assessee for interest on capital contribution by the partners and salary to the working partners is covered by the said provisions?
(ii). Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT was justified in allowing the claim of depreciation interest and salary to partners etc. despite the income being determined by applying net profit rate after rejecting the books of accounts
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.