ARUN MADAN
Hanuman Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Laduram & Mahaveer Prasad – Respondent
(2). Brief facts relevant for deciding this revision petition are that petitioner Hanuman Prasad filed a complaint under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. with the allegations inter-alia that he had good relations with the accused respondents, who had come to his place in village Devroad on 2.8.90 with a proposal to purchase an agricultural land situated adjacent to their lands in village Kherla and they also re-quested to provide them loan of Rs. 44,000/-which was given by him to them with the understanding to repay the same within 15 days. After a lapse of aforesaid 15 days, when the complainant was not repaid aforesaid loan amount by the accused-respondents, he went to the place of the accused with the reminder to make repayment of the amount but all in vain and one day on 1.9.1990, accused-respon-dent No. 1 alongwith his friend whom he did not know, came to his house situated in his agricultural field when he was told that they could not arrange the amount and requested to accept a cheque so
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.