SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Raj) 471

AMRESH KUMAR SINGH, N.N.MATHUR
Chandra Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P. Joshi, for Appellant Anand Purohit, for Respondents

Honble MATHUR, J.–This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 23.6.99 dismissing the writ petition seeking direction to quash article of charges dated 16.4.99 and the order of suspension of the same date.

(2). The admitted facts are that the appellant -writ petitioner (hereinafter referred-to as `petitioner) was elected as Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat, Tinwa-ri, District Jodhpur, in the year 1995. The Ward Panchas of the said Gram Panchayat viz; S/Shri Nemichand Parihar, Ramswaroop Soni and others lodged the complaint dt. 1.5.98 before the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jodhpur against the conduct of the petitioner. Another complaint was filed by Ward Panchas S/Shri Ramswaroop and Ganesh Ram on 2.5.98. Petitioner also filed a complaint on 4.5.98. On receipt of the said complaints, the Chief Executive Officer by order dt. 11.5.98 directed Shri Chhotu Singh, Panchayat Extension Officer, to enquire into the complaints. The Extension Officer summoned the entire record of the Gram Panchayat and recorded the statements of various persons including the petitioner. The petitioner participated in the enquiry and submitted number of documents in h





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top