ARUN MADAN, P.K.TEWARI
Sikandar Ali – Appellant
Versus
Nagar Nigam Jaipur – Respondent
(2). The appellants are the contractors and they had been given contract by Nagar Nigam Jaipur, respondent No. 1 for removal of garbage from the garbage collection points of Nagar Nigam Jaipur on the basis of tenders invited from general public by way of publication in various newspapers for the year 1996-97. In response to the said advertisement, the appellants had submitted their tenders as per terms & conditions of the tender notice and after due scrutiny of their tenders, they were given contract for removal of garbage and transportation. The work contract for the year 1996-97 was extended for the next year i.e. 1997-98 (vide Annexure-3) to the writ petition and again for the year 1998-99 (vide Annexure-4) to the writ petition with 10% increase of rates.
(3). The case of the appellants before the learned Single Judge was that for the year 1999-2000 the committee which was constituted by the Jaipur Nagar Nigam, respondent No. 1 had recommend
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.