SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Raj) 439

ARUN MADAN, P.K.TEWARI
Sikandar Ali – Appellant
Versus
Nagar Nigam Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Naina Saraf and S.R. Yadav, for Appellants P.C. Jain and Subhash Jain, for Respondents

Honble MADAN, J.–This appeal arises out of judgment and order dt. 4.2.1999 of the learned Single Judge of this Court passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 586/99 whereby, the writ petition preferred by the petitioners was dismissed in limine.

(2). The appellants are the contractors and they had been given contract by Nagar Nigam Jaipur, respondent No. 1 for removal of garbage from the garbage collection points of Nagar Nigam Jaipur on the basis of tenders invited from general public by way of publication in various newspapers for the year 1996-97. In response to the said advertisement, the appellants had submitted their tenders as per terms & conditions of the tender notice and after due scrutiny of their tenders, they were given contract for removal of garbage and transportation. The work contract for the year 1996-97 was extended for the next year i.e. 1997-98 (vide Annexure-3) to the writ petition and again for the year 1998-99 (vide Annexure-4) to the writ petition with 10% increase of rates.

(3). The case of the appellants before the learned Single Judge was that for the year 1999-2000 the committee which was constituted by the Jaipur Nagar Nigam, respondent No. 1 had recommend


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top