G.T.NANAVATI, S.N.PHUKAN
Laxman Naskar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
(2). Writ petitions have been filed on behalf of ``life convicts as their prayer for pre-mature release was rejected by the Government of West Bengal. The common grievance is that though they have entitled for pre-mature release under relevant rules, their prayer was rejected by the Government on extraneous consideration.
(3). It is settled position of law that life sentence is nothing less than lifelong imprisonment and by earning remissions a life convict does not acquire a right to be released prematurely; but if the Government has framed any rule or made a scheme for early release of such convicts then those rules or schemes will have to be treated as guidelines for exercising its power under Article 161 of the Constitution and if according to the Government policy/instructions in force at the relevant time the life convict has already undergone the sentence for the period mentioned in the policy/instructions then the only right which a life convict can be said to have acquired is the right to have
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.