A.R.LAKSHMANAN, ARUN MADAN
Vijay Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
``(i) declare the action of the respondents in not providing reservation to the disabled persons while making selections for PG Courses, as bad in law;
(ii) further by writ of mandamus the respondents be directed to implement the Act of 1955 and the recommendations given by the Commissioner Disabilities and provide atleast 3% reservations to the physically handicapped persons in the Pre PG Entrance Examination, 2000 for admission to MD/MS Diploma Courses;
(iii) the respondents be further directed to seek option from the petitioner for PG seats for the various faculties and grant him admission as per his merit vis-a-vis other physically handicapped persons;
(iv) direct the respondents to prepare a separate merit for physically handicapped persons in the Pre PG Entrance Examination, 2000;
(v) any other order or direction as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case may also be passed in favour of humble petitioner;
(vi) Cost of this writ pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.