SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 621

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, RAJESH BALIA
Madan Singh* – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan High Court – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.S. Bhati, for Appellant

Honble LAKSHMANAN, C.J.–Heard Mr. P.S. Bhati, learned counsel for the appellant.

(2). This appeal is directed against the order passed by Honble Palshikar, J. dated 04.08.2000 in SBCW Pet. No. 2661/2000 rejecting the contentions raised on behalf of the appellant that he is entitled to contest, as the Head Legal Assistant working in the Government Advocate Office, is a Law Officer.

(3). The appellant, at present is working in the Government Advocates Office at Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur. He is also working as a part-time Lecturer in the Academic Session 1999-2000 at the Law Faculty of Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. It is also his case that he regularly made appearance before the Dy. Registrar of this Court and other Tribunals. He submitted his application form for direct recruitment to the Rajasthan Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service (RHJS) and the same was rejected on the ground that he was not enrolled as an advocate in the Bar Council, vide letter dated 18.7.2000. According to the learned counsel for the appellant, the appellant was eligible to plead as a lawyer and that however, his claim was not considered by the respondents and the appellants claim for appearing in the e







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top