SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Hazari – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). The necessary facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows:-
On 21.1.1997, S.H.O., Police Station Kotwali, Chittorgarh Shri Ganpat Singh Chouhan, PW13 received a secret information that two persons having opium with them are travelling by Roadways Bus from Neemach to Delhi and the Bus is likely to arrive at Bus Stand Chittorgarh at about 8.45 PM. That information has been reduced in writing to make the compliance of Section 42 of the NDPS Act and, thereafter, for making further compliance of the said Section, that information was sent to Dy. Superintendent of Police, Chittorgarh by PW13 Ganpat Singh Chouhan and thereafter, he alongwith police party consi
2. Mohinder Kumar vs. The State, Panaji
4. Manohar Lal vs. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1996 SC 2880 = RLW 1996(1) SC 71).–Followed.
6. Ali Mustaffa Abdul Rahman Moosa vs. State of Kerala (AIR 1995 SC 244)
7. T.Hamza vs. State of Kerala (AIR 1999 SC 2966 = RLW 1999(2) SC 342).–Followed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.