B.J.SHETHNA
Shanker Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). On 3.6.96, the petitioner submitted an application for a permit in the prescribed form in respect of the aforesaid route. The copy of the said application dated 3.6.96 in the prescribed form is at Annex.1. However, the said application of the petitioner was rejected by member, R.T.A., Bikaner on the ground that the petitioner had not produced any proof regarding his residence nor he has produced any cash receipt regarding the payment of application fees.
(3). According to the petitioner, the aforesaid decision of Member, R.T.A., Bikaner taken on 11.9.96 was not received in writing, therefore, on 30.9.97, he submitted an application for certified copy of the impugned order dated 11.9.96 passed by R.T.
2. S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu vs. Jagannath (AIR 1994 SC 853).–Relied on.
3. R.Obali Swami Naidu vs. Addl. S.T.A.T. Madras (AIR 1969 SC 1130)
5. Mohd. Yunus vs. Mohd. Mustaqim (AIR 1984 SC 38)
1. Daudayal vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal
4. Gani Mohammed vs. The State Transport Appellate Tribunal (1976 RLW 201)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.