SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 350

B.J.SHETHNA
Shanker Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L. Maheshwari, for Petitioner

Honble SHETHNA, J.–The State of Rajasthan and State of Haryana entered into a reciprocal transport agreement in respect of Sidhumukh to Bhiwani Via Tosham Inter-State route. The said agreement was dated 5/6/7/8.2.1968 as stated in para 2 of the petition. As per the said agreement, daily one return trip would be performed by the nominees of the State of Rajasthan and accordingly, the competent authority in the State of Rajasthan sanctioned one stage carriage permit on the said route.

(2). On 3.6.96, the petitioner submitted an application for a permit in the prescribed form in respect of the aforesaid route. The copy of the said application dated 3.6.96 in the prescribed form is at Annex.1. However, the said application of the petitioner was rejected by member, R.T.A., Bikaner on the ground that the petitioner had not produced any proof regarding his residence nor he has produced any cash receipt regarding the payment of application fees.

(3). According to the petitioner, the aforesaid decision of Member, R.T.A., Bikaner taken on 11.9.96 was not received in writing, therefore, on 30.9.97, he submitted an application for certified copy of the impugned order dated 11.9.96 passed by R.T.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top