RAJESH BALIA, SUNIL KUMAR GARG
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Kumar – Respondent
(2). The facts giving rise to these appeals are that the petitioners in these two writ petitions were members of the Rajasthan Tehsildar Service. The recruitment to the Rajasthan Administrative Service is governed by the Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954. Under Rule 7, two sources of recruitment have been provided namely direct recruitment through combined competitive examination and by promotion of Tehsildars. The ratio between two sources from which recruitment is to be made to the service have been varied from time to time. Vide notification dated 21.8.97, the rules were amended and the ratio through direct recruitment and promotion was fixed as 66.7% and 33.3% respectively in place of 75% and 25%. The said amendment in the rules had been made effective with effect from 1.4.97. According to the petitioners, the cadre strength of RAS is about 752 and the same is likely to increase in future. The grievance o
1. O.P. Garg vs. State of U.P. (AIR 1991 SC 1202)
3. A.K. Subraman vs. Union of India (AIR 1975 SC 483)
4. O.P. Singla vs. Union of India (AIR 1984 SC 1595)
5. G.C. Gupta vs. N.K. Pandey (AIR 1988 SC 268)
7. State of Haryana vs. Piara Singh (AIR 1992 SC 2130)
10. K. Prasad vs. Union of India (AIR 1988 SC 535)
8. Baleshwar Dass vs. State of U.P. (1980(4) SCC 226)
11. C. Krishna Gowda vs. State of Karnataka (1998(2) SCC 615)
13. V.B. Badami vs. State of Mysore (1976(2) SCC 901)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.