SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 662

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, RAJESH BALIA
Om Prakash Purohit – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Om Prakash, Petitioner Present in person

Honble BALIA, J.–Appellant in this appeal is an Engineer employed in the Central Public Works Department. While he was working as Superintending Engineer, Jodhpur Central Circle, CPWD, Jodhpur, the appellant was ordered to be transferred as Superintending Engineer, (Valuation) Bhopal vide order dated 19.7.99, which was communicated by the Deputy Director (Administration), New Delhi, from the office of the Directorate General of the Central Public Works Department. The order was at the instance of the Director General of the Central Public Works Department. By the same order Mr. R.P. Mathur, respondent No. 5 in this appeal who was then working as Superintending Engineer, P&A, North Zone III, Jaipur was posted vice appellant. The order dated 19.07.1999 in all contained 4 transfers including of the appellant and said Mr. R.P. Mathur. According to that order, one Lalit Mohan, S.E. (Valuation), Bhopal has been transferred as S.E. (P&A) North Zone III Jaipur vice Mr. R.P (2) Mathur and one Vipin Chand, who was S.E. (Parliament Library Project, New Delhi was transferred as S.E. (Planning) IBBZ, Siliguri. While the transfers of Mr. O.P. Purohit and Mr. R.P. Mathur and Mr. Lalit Mohan were


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top