Rajasthan High Court
Honble DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN C.J. & RAJESH BALIA, J.
Avinash Kant - Appellant
Versus
Central Administrative Tribunal & Anr. - Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 991 of 1998
Decided On : December 21, 2000
RAILWAY RECRUITMENT BOARD
41/32, Majo College Road
Ajmer 305 001.
No. RRB/RECT/84-85 (1/84)
Employment Notice No. 1184
Roll No. 108275
108092
To, Avinash Kant Gaur s/o Shri Krishna Kant Gaur, 14, Sangidas Thanvi Building, Inside Pole, Mahatma Gandhi Hospital Road, Jodhpur.
With reference to your application for the post of Clerk Gr. I notified in Employment Notice No. 1184 Category No. 3 you are informed that:-
You have qualified in the written Examination/Interview, but your final appointment will be made by the office of the Divisional Accounts Office, Northern Railway, who will in due course send you an offer of appointment provided you are otherwise suitable.
NOTE ; NO FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE WILL BE ENTERTAINED
Sd/-
for Chairman,
Railway Recruitment Board,
Ajmer.
(2). In pursuance of this letter, the petitioner was given appointment vide order dated 4.8.1987. Subsequent to that, the petitioner was transferred from the office of Accounts Officer, Traffic Accounts, Northern Railway to office of Divisional Accounts Officer, Northern Railway, Jodhpur on 24.05.1988. The petitioner in due course passed the Appendix II-A Test and was consequently promoted to the post of Accounts Assistant. In the year 1990, Appendix III-A Test was held for appointment/promotion to the post of Section Officer (Accounts) in which the petitioner was declared successful on 31.07.1991 and a panel was prepared on 11.5.92. In this panel Annx. 6, the petitioner was shown at Serial No. 17 on the basis of the placement of his name in the panel for clerks Gr. I dated 27.8.1985. This panel was subsequently changed vide communication dated 2.12.1992. In the panels dated 2.12.1992 and 15.2.1993 the petitioner has been assigned the position on the basis of his name in the panel of Clerks Gr. I issued by the Railway Recruitment Board, Ajmer on 27.5.87. The petitioner made representations to the superior authorities and ultimately filed Original Application No. 56/93 before the Central Administrative Tribunal. The petitioners case was that as per Paragraph 306 regulating seniority of non-gazetted railway servants, a candidate for appointment at an earlier selection shall be senior to those selected later irrespective of the date of posting. The petitioner having been selected for appointment on the grade of Clerk Grade I and informed of such selection for appointment vide Annx. 2 dated 13.9.1985, his date of selection remains 27.8.1985 and it could not have been changed to the date of panel issued in year 1987 when actual posting orders were issued to him. The placement in the panel of selection for Accounts Assistant dated 19.5.92 was rightly made on the basis of his empanelment dated 27.8.1985. Therefore, his placement ought to have been made in the panel of 2.12.92 also as per his name in the panel of Clerks Gr. I dated 27.8.1985 and placement as disclosed in the panel dated 19.5.92 could not have been altered in the panel dated 2.12.92 and panels prepared subsequent thereto.
(3). The Original Application was dismissed by the Central Administra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.