SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Raj) 838

V.G.PALSHIKAR
Gaushala Sri Karanpur – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.L. Purohit, for Petitioner None present, for Respondents

Honble PALSHIKAR, J.–By this petition the petitioner has challenged the concurrent orders passed by the Revenue Authorities holding that the sale of agricultural land by the respondents in favour of the petitioner is void ab initio being hit by the provisions of section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as ``the Tenancy Act).

(2). The petitioner is a registered trust created for the purposes of maintaining in good stead chattel in Rajasthan, it is devoted to maintaining, upbringing, feeding of cows and similar milch animals in the area.

(3). That the petitioner is duly registered with the Registrar of Gaushala at Jaipur under the provisions of the Rajasthan Gaushala Act, 1960, it is a purely charitable institution created for the purposes of maintaining the chattel as aforesaid. The petitioner would have end in mind, purchased 7 bighas of land in square No.12, Chak No. 5F from one Buta Singh son of Surfoo Singh by a registered sale-deed and the petitioner Gaushala is in possession of this land since then.

(4). That a suit was filed on 10.1.1978 by respondents No.5 to 13 who are respective of Buta Singh the original vendor of the petitioner in the court of











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top