ARUN MADAN, K.S.RATHORE
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Asha Devi – Respondent
(2). The facts leading to this appeal are that the appellants (State and its department of medical & health services) invited applications for training of Lady Health Worker Course for the year 1998 requiring the applicants to also submit proof of bonafide resident certificate of Rajasthan and with reference thereto, the present respondent (petitioner in writ petition-for short `writ petitioner) applied for such training course and she was called for interview on 22.12.97 but was not interviewed on the pretext of lacking domicile of Rajasthan. Against this refusal, the writ petitioner made representation stating therein that since she married with Sanwal Ram Diyma r/o village Ram Chandrapura of Alwar district on 13.5.1989 and she produced residence certificate (Ann. 2). It is the case of the writ petitioner that she was deprived of admission because the bonafide resident certificate cannot be accepted, whereas after her marriage she was living with her husband who was bonafide resident and domicile of R
1. Chistopher Andrew vs. Neelakantan (AIR 1959 Rajasthan 133)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.