SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 655

ARUN MADAN, K.S.RATHORE
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Asha Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sanjay Tyagi, for appellants Department Ashok Kumar Shahdadpuri, for Respondent

Honble MADAN, J.–This special appeal is directed against the judgment dated 22.4.99 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby writ petition filed by the respondent has been allowed.

(2). The facts leading to this appeal are that the appellants (State and its department of medical & health services) invited applications for training of Lady Health Worker Course for the year 1998 requiring the applicants to also submit proof of bonafide resident certificate of Rajasthan and with reference thereto, the present respondent (petitioner in writ petition-for short `writ petitioner) applied for such training course and she was called for interview on 22.12.97 but was not interviewed on the pretext of lacking domicile of Rajasthan. Against this refusal, the writ petitioner made representation stating therein that since she married with Sanwal Ram Diyma r/o village Ram Chandrapura of Alwar district on 13.5.1989 and she produced residence certificate (Ann. 2). It is the case of the writ petitioner that she was deprived of admission because the bonafide resident certificate cannot be accepted, whereas after her marriage she was living with her husband who was bonafide resident and domicile of R






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top