Honble MADAN, J.–Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2). This revision petition has been preferred against the order dated. 2.3.2000 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, jambharlake in Civil Suit No. 176/1992, whereby the trial court had dismissed defendants-petitioners application under Order 11 Rule 14 CPC.

(3). The undisputed facts are that the plaintiff respondent UCO Bank had filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 4,09,500/- against the defendants/petitioners, who stood as guarantors before the trial court. Defendants No.1, 3, 6, 8 & 9 filed a joint written statement denying the averments of the plaintiff and pleaded that the suit of the plaintiff be dismissed with cost.

(4). Thereafter on or about 19.3.1998, the defendants/petitioners filed an application before the trial court under Order 11 Rule 14 CPC for issuing direction to the plaintiff-Bank for production of the following documents:-

(i) pledge register for the period from 14.4.1979 to 17.10.1989 which has prepared by the Bank at the time of pledging the goods of the defendants;

(ii) Inspection note or inspection register which was made by the Bank Officers of the firm of the defendants from time to time during th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document