SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Suresh Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). They arise in the following circumstances.:-
Facts pertaining to accused appellant Suresh Chandra (S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 266/2000):
On 11.4.1994 at about 5.15 AM, PW11 Satish Kumar, SHO, Police Station Sambhupura received a secret information from Mukhbir to the effect that one Suresh Chandra was engaging himself in the business of contraband opium and on that day he would come on foot alongwith the contraband opium from village Bhawaliya. That information was reduced into writing by PW 11 Satish Kumar and the same is Ex.P/18 and its copy was also forwarded by him to superior officers. Thereafter, as per that information, PW 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.