SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 528

B.J.SHETHNA
Bharat Singh – Appellant
Versus
Vimla – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.R. Chaudhary, for Petitioner Sanjay Mathur, for Respondent G.K. Vyas, Public Prosecutor

Honble SHETHNA, J.–The case of petitioner complainant is that on 26.7.1980 he applied for permission from the Gram Panchayat for construction on the land of his owner-ship alongwith the map of the land. Permission was accorded to him on 31.3.1981 by the Gram Panchayat. On 4.10.1989, when he started to construct `Pakka Wall in front of his house, Ganesh Lal (Present respondent No.8) and Laxman Singh (father of Lal Singh-respondent No.10) and his brother Dilip Singh prevented him from putting up `Pakka Wall and tried to encroach upon his land. Therefore, he filed civil suit No. 47/89 before the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Div.) Sagwara against them for declaration and permanent injunction. The said suit was decreed in his favour by the trial court on 19.2.1996 and the said plot measuring 22 x 25 was declared to be of his owner-ship and in his possession. Accordingly, they were restrained from interfering with the work of putting up `Pakka Wall.

(2). The aforesaid judgment and decree passed by the trial court was challenged by them before the District Court, Doongarpur in appeal No. 3/96. However, the same was dismissed on 20.11.1996 by the learned District Judge, Doongarpur.

(3). In spit


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top