SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Cosmopolitan Trading Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Engineering Sales Corporation – Respondent
(2). The parties shall be hereinafter referred in the same manner as they were arrayed in the plaints.
(3). The plaintiff M/s. Cosmopolitan Trading Corporation instituted a suit for recovery of Rs. 17.40 lacs against the defendants 1 to 5. Alongwith the suit applications bearing No. 135/2000 under Order 38 Rule 5 and No. 137/200 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC were filed. Similarly the plaintiff Harish Chand Bader instituted another suit for recovery of Rs. 19.80 lacs against the defendants 1 to 5 with two applications under Order 38 Rule 5 and Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC bearing Nos. 134/2000 and 136/2000. The plaintiffs averred in the applications that the defendants 1 to 5 are bent upon to dispose of their properties in order to make impossible of execution of the decree to be passed in the suits. In th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.