Honble MADAN, J.–Shorn in details the facts giving rise to this second appeal are that Sajjan Raj Surana (plaintiff appellant) instituted a civil suit for permanent injunction with the averments inter alia that he has been practicing advocate not only in the subordinate courts but also before this Court; he had taken electric connection from erstwhile Rajasthan State Electricity Board (RSEB) (now substituted as Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Jaipur) bearing Account No. 28A/112-4 Zone III for his rented premises in a residential building known as Rahim Manzil, M.I. Road Jaipur, where his office cum chamber is established. His case in the plaint was that being an advocate by his profession he is not indulged in any commercial activities to the suit premises but the defendant (RSEB) charged for electric connection to his chamber as a commercial establishment whereas at that time, domestic charges was 59P. as against commercial one at Rs. 1.05, per unit.

(2). In written statement, the defendant (RSEB) had a case that the suit premises has been situated in a Rahim manzil which was in a commercial area, inasmuch as according to application dt.26.6.87 the plaintiff applied for electricity

Click Here to Read the rest of this document