SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Bheru Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). In this case, Mool Singh complainant was not made a party by the accused petitioner but by order of this Court dated 23.3.2001, notice was issued to the complainant and on his behalf his counsel has given appearance.
(3). The facts giving rise to this revision petition are as follows:
(i) Mool Singh complainant filed a complaint on 8.7.92 in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Phalodi against the present accused petitioner and some other accused persons stating that the accused petitioner Bheru Lal along with other accused persons made a conspiracy to swallow up the complainants land and purchased stamp paper in the name of Mool Singh (Complainant) and land bearing Khasra No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.