SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1164

S.K.KESHOTE
Laxmi Narain Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Soni, for Petitioners Naina Sarraf, Amrish Jain, for Respondents

Honble KESHOTE, J.–Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the writ petition, reply to the writ petition, annexures and rejoinder to the reply filed by the petitioner.

(2). The petitioners in all 15 in number have filed writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and are praying for direction to be issued to the respondents to give them the benefits of Revised Upgraded UGC Pay-Scales i.e. Rs. 700-1600 w.e.f. 1.4.1980.

(3). It is next that the respondents be further directed to pay the petitioners the arrears of the fixation with interest @ 18% per-annum and to give them other consequential benefits admissible under the law as per the judgment dated 8.10.1990 of this Court in the case of Rajasthan University and College Physical Education Teachers Association and another vs. The State of Rajasthan (1).

(4). The petitioners have passed their B.A./M.A. and B.Lib Examinations and thereafter having been regularly selected were appointed and are working as a Librarian in various Colleges of Education Department, Government of Rajasthan, from the date of their initial appointment till date.

(5). The respondents have revised the pay-scales of the Lecturers/Readers an















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top