Honble KESHOTE, J.–Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2). Admit. Mr. Amin Ali has already put appearance for the contesting respondent. So far as respondent No.2 is concerned it is neither necessary nor proper party to this petition, its name is deleted. Office to put an endorsement to that extent in the cause title. The matter is complete.

(3). On the request of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.

(4). In this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution the petitioner is challenging the order dated 29.7.98 of the Labour Court, Bharatpur in LCR No.59/96. Under the impugned order in this petition the application filed by the petitioner for recalling the order dated 8.1.98 of the petitioner was came to be rejected. On 8.1.98 the Labour Court, Bharatpur has closed the right of the petitioner to file the reply to the statement of claim in the matter.

(5). The facts of the case and the grounds raised to challenge this order in the petition need not be given in detail as the learned counsel for the contesting respondent workman has no objection in case the petitioners are given one more opportunity to file the reply to the statement of claim and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document