SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 122

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Kewal Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L. Garg, for Petitioner Panne Singh, Public Prosecutor

Honble GARG, J.–This revision petition has been filed by the accused petitioner against the judgment dated 11.9.1987 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Raisinghnagar in Criminal Appeal No. 72/83 by which he dismissed the appeal of the accused petitioner and confirmed judgment and order dated 9.6.1983 passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raisinghnagar in Criminal Case No. 250/80 by which the learned ACJM convicted and sentenced the accused petitioner in the following manner:-

Name of accused petitioner Convicted u/Sec. Sentence awarded

Kewal Ram 419 IPC Two years RI

468 IPC Two years Six months RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 50/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 10 days SI.

471/467 IPC Two years RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 50/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo 10 days SI.

All the above substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

By the same judgment, the learned ACJM acquitted accused Mst. Gaura and Gangaram for the offence under sections 419, 467, 468 read with 120-B IPC.

(2). The facts giving rise to this revision, in short, are as follows:-

On 24.4.1975, one Mst. Gangi filed a complaint before the Court of Magistra

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top