SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1296

B.B.MOHANTY
State of Raj. – Appellant
Versus
Gokalram – Respondent


Advocates:
S.K. Purohit, Dy. Govt. Advocate, for State
Jaidev Singh Charan, for Non-Petitioner

MOHANTY, M.–This is a revision petition filed under Section 84 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act) against the order of the Revenue Appellate Authority, Jodhpur dated 29.8.97.in file No. 83197.

(2). This brief facts of the case are that a portion of khasra No. 794 measuring 10 biswas situated in village Kankani Tehsil Luni is classified as `gair mumkin pahadi, in which a Bada has been constructed by Shri Gokalram the non-applicant against whom proceedings u/S. 91 of the L.R. Act was filed by the Tehsildar, Luni. The Tehsildar after hearing both the parties, imposed a penalty and ordered dispossession of the non-petitioner from the Government land. Against the order of the Tehsildar, an appeal was filed before the Collector, Jodhpur who after hearing both the parties, confirmed the order of the Tehsildar vide his order dated 02.6.97. A second appeal was filed before the R.A.A., Jodhpur which was accepted and the case was sent for regularisation. The present revision petition has been filed against the order of the R.A.A..Jodhpur dated 29.8.97.

(3). The learned Dy. Govt. Advocate and the advocate for the non- petitioner argued the case only on


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top