SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 161

S.C.SINGHAL
Hariram – Appellant
Versus
Deep Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
Ayyub Khan, for Petitioner;
Khadak Singh, for Respondent No.1;
J.P. Mathur, Govt. Advocate, for Respondent No.2

fla?ky] lnL;-&fuxjkdkj@oknh dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh /kkjk230 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ ds v/khu lgk;d dysDVj] ckulwj dSEi cgjksM ds vknsk fukad 26-8-96 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gS ftlds }kjk mUgksaus vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 nhipUn }kjk izLrqr fd;s x;s vkosnu vknsk 1 fu;e 10 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk dks Lohdkj dj mls ewy okn esa i{kdkj cuk;s tkus dh vuqefr nh gSA

2- rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd fuxjkdkj@oknh gjhjke dh vksj ls lgk;d dysDVj] ckulwj ds U;k;ky; esa fooknxzLr vkjkth [kljk uEcj 606] 607] 608] 550 o 551 ckds xzke vkuUniqj ds lEcU/k esa vizkFkhZ la[;k 2 jktLFkku ljdkj ds fo:) /kkjk 88 o 188 vf/kfu;e ds v/khu okn izLrqr fd;k x;k fd lu~ 1975 esa mls lkfcd [kljk uEcj 301 ehu jdck <kbZ ch?kk dk vkoaVu gqvk Fkk o vkoaVu ds ipkr~ mlds uke bUrdky ntZ gks x;k rFkk bUnzkt Hkh tekcUnh laor~ 2032 esa xSj [kkrsnkjh dk gks pqdk FkkA gky cUnkscLr esa mijksä [kljk uEcj 301 ehu ls 5 [kljk uEcjku~ cus gSa ftuesa ls mldh [kkrsnkjh] mldk dCtk gksrk gqvk Hkh [kljk uEcj 606] 607 o 608 ij vafdr u djrs gq, flok;pd ntZ dj nh xbZ gS o vU; vkjkth ij mls [kkrsnkjh dk bUnzkt dj fn;k x;k gSA vr% [kljk uEcj 606] 607 o 608 dh ckcr~ [kkrsnkjh dh ?kks"k.kk fd;s tkus o vizkFkhZ la[;k 2 dks tfj;s














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top