BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
Ram Pyari – Appellant
Versus
B. O. R. – Respondent
(2). According to the petitioners, proceedings against Shri Sanwar Lal Mansinghka and his wife Smt. Ram Pyari one of the petitioners alongwith legal representative of Sawarmal were initiated in Ceiling Case No. 19/1973. These proceedings were decided by the then Authorised Officer by the judgment dt. 2.12.1975. It was held by the Authorised Officer that Sanwarmal was holding following lands:-
S.
No. Name of Village Measurement
Bighas Acres Standard Acres
1. Arjiya 61.12 33 9.52
2. Kotiya 63.03 39 22.50
3. Lambiya Kalan 95.3 56 16.5
Total: 219.18 128 48.17
(3). According to the petitioners, in those proceedings, the Tehsildar reported that there is separate possession of various persons on various parcels of land. After calculation, it was held that late Shri Sanwarmal was entitled to hold 30 standard acres of land. He had 18.17 standard acres of surplus land, option was accordingly made for such land. Alongwith the proceedings initiated against late Shri S
4. Kale and Others vs. Director of Consolidation & Others (AIR 1976 SC 807)
5. Tek Bahadur Bhujil vs. Debi Singh Bhujil (AIR 1966 SC 292)
2. Taraknath and Another vs. Sushil Chandra Dey by L.Rs. and Others (1996 (4) SCC 697)
13. Banshidhar vs. State (1989(2) SCC 557)
8. Kishanlal vs. State of Rajasthan (1997 (3) WLC 184 = RLW 1997(2) Raj. 1096)
10. Hameer Singh vs. State decided on 28.1.1998 (1998 RRD 476 = RLW 1998(3) Raj. 1984)
12. Ram Gopal vs. State of Rajasthan (1989(1) WLN Revenue Page 252 = 1989(1) RLW 670)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.