RASHMI PRIYADARSHINI, H.S.PUNIA
Govind Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mahadev – Respondent
(2). The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that father of the appellant filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction under Section 88 and 92A of the Act against the respondents No. 1 & 2 with the averment that the land bearing khasra No. 14 area 69.19 bighas situated at Vill. Devasar is in cultivatory possession of the plaintiff for the last 40 years and this land was also in possession and cultivation of the plaintiff during the settlement operation Smt. 2005 and therefore, the plaintiff has become khatedar tenant of the land. It was further alleged that the defendants tried to occupy the land alleging that the land in dispute has been allotted to them. Since the plaintiff was khatedar tenant of the land in dispute it could not be allotted to the defendants. The defendants contested the suit by way of written statement and it was alle
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.