SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 213

H.R.PANWAR
Badrilal – Appellant
Versus
Sunil – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dinesh Maheshwari, for Appellants- Petitioners G. Vaishnava, for Respondents

Honble PANWAR, J.–S.B. Civil Misc. Appeals No. 572/94, 598/94, 668/94 and S.B. Civil Revision No. 1224/94 arise out of same suit and between the same parties and involve common questions of law and facts and, therefore, for convenience they are decided jointly.

(2). S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 572/94 is directed against the order dated 24.10.94 passed by District Judge, Udaipur on an application filed by the respondents under Sec. 15 C.P.C. read with sections 10 and 49 of the Rajasthan Court Fees & Suits Valuation Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act) whereby the trial court allowed the application filed by the respondent-defendants and directed the suit to be returned to the plaintiff-appellants for presentation to a proper court on the ground that the suit was not properly valued.

(3). S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 598/94 is also directed against the order dated 24.10.94 whereby the trial court dismissed the application filed by the plaintiff-appellants seeking temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 2 C.P.C.

(4). S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 668/94 is directed against the order dated 21.11.94 passed by the trial court whereby the trial court dismissed the application file




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top