SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 913

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Shanker Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sandeep Mehta, for Appellants M.A. Bhurat, Public Prosecutor

Honble GARG, J.–This appeal has been filed by the accused appellants against the judgment and order dated 16.1.1999 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Chittorgarh in Session Case No. 214/97 (102/96) by which he convicted the accused appellant for the offence under Sec. 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotrophic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as `the NDPS Act) and sentenced them to undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs. one lac, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for two years.

(2). The facts giving rise to this appeal, in short, are as follows:-

On 24.6.1996 at about 11.00 PM, PW 14 Prithvi Singh, SHO, Police Station Chanderiya District Chittorgarh made Parchakayami (Ex.P/24) stating inter-alia that he received a secret information at about 8.00 PM from mukhbir to the effect that accused appellant no. 2 Parthu, resident of Paroli and accused appellant No. 1 Shanker, also resident of Paroli had gone to Mishro-ki- pipli for purchasing opium and after purchasing it, they were coming on cycle alongwith the opium and in case the search was not conducted within time, there was every possibility that they would conceal


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top