Rajasthan High Court
Honble SUNIL KUMAR GARG, J.
Pania & Ors. - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 456 of 1987
Decided On : February 22, 2002
Accused appellant kharta Ram did not commit any rape with the prosecutrix PW6 Jatna and no force was used by the accused appellants against her and she was above the age of 16 years, therefore, in these circumstances, how the accused appellants could be convicted u/Sec.458 IPC, it is beyond imagination, as the basic ingredients for proving the charge under section 458 IPC are missing in this case. In the present case, it cannot be said that the accused appellants entered the house of PW7 Geeta after lurking themselves and furthermore, when the charge of causing injuries to PW7 Geeta was not found proved by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, therefore, it cannot be said that the accused appellants entered her after making preparation for causing injuries to her or wrongfully restraining prosecutrix PW6 Jatna or PW7 Geeta. (Para 7)
(2). It arises in the following circumstances :-
On 31.5.1982, PW-7 Mst. Geeta lodged a written report Ex.P/7 with the Police Station Sadri District Pali stating inter-alia that on 31.5.1982 at about 1.00 AM in the morning, her daughter Jatna (PW-6) (hereinafter referred to as the prosecutrix) aged about 16 years had been kidnapped by some persons. It was further stated in the report that when she was sleeping in front of her house, at that time, four persons suddenly entered her house after breaking the door and they also started beating her as well as her daughter prosecutrix PW-6 Jatna and after pulling prosecutrix PW6 Jatna, they took her outside the house and after putting her in the motor, which was standing outside her house, they took her and at that time, she was weeping severely. It was further stated in the report by PW7 Mst. Geeta that her husband had gone to Sadri and after coming to Sadri, she lodged that report.
On this report, police registered the case and chalked out regular FIR Ex.P/8 and started investigation.
During investigation, through fard Ex.P/3, the prosecutrix PW6 Jatna was got recovered from the possession of the accused appellant Kharta Ram. Therefore, the prosecutrix PW6 Jatna was got medically examined by PW16 Dr. Champalal and her medical examination report is Ex.P/18.
After usual investigation, police submitted challan against the accused appellants and one more accused Mst. Jamni in the Court of Magistrate, from where the case was committed to the Court of Session.
On 12.8.1986, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Bali framed charges against the accused appellants and one more accused Mst. Jamni in the following manner :-
Name of accused persons Charges
1. Kharta 458, 366, 323, 323/34, 342 and 376 IPC
2. Pania 458, 366, 323, 323/34 and 342 IPC
3. Jeevla 458, 366, 323, 323/34 and 342 IPC
4. Mst. Jamni 368 read with 366 IPC.
The charges were read over and explained to the accused persons. The accused persons denied the charges and claimed trial.
During trial, the prosecution in support of its case examined as many as 16 witnesses and got exhibited some documents. Thereafter, statements of the accused persons under Section 313 Cr.P.C. were recorded. In defence, five witnesses were produced by the accused persons.
The learned Addl. Sessions Judge, after recording evidence, formulated the following questions in his impugned judgment and order dated 31.10.1987 :-
1. That whether the accused appellants entered the house of PW7 Geeta after making preparation of beating her and her family members and with an intention to kidnap her daughter prosecutrix PW6 Jatna?
2. That whether accused appellants kidnapped prosecutrix PW6 Jatna with an intention that she may be compelled to marry with the accused appellant Kharta Ram and whether at that time, prosecutrix PW6 Jatna was 16 years of age?
3. That whether accused appellants caused injuries to the prosecutrix PW6 Jatna, her mother PW7 Geeta and her brother?
4. That whether after kidnapping prosecutrix PW6 Jatna, the accused appellants used force against her?
5. That whether accused appellant Kharta Ram committed rape with the prosecutrix PW6 Jatna?
6. That whether accused Mst. Jamni wrongfully concealed prosecutri
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.