SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1256

ARUN MADAN
Mohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Bhawani Shanker – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L. Mandhana, for Petitioners Bhanwar Bagri, for Respondents

Honble MADAN, J.–The abovenoted revision petition is directed against the order dt. 26.4.1997 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Anta (Baran) in Co. No. 157/96 whereby the plaintiffs (respondents) application under Order 8 Rule 6 CPC was allowed excluding the counter claim filed by the petitioners/defendants.

(2). The facts which are relevant for deciding this revision petition briefly stated are that on 10.4.95 the plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as ``the respondents) filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendants (hereinafter referred to ``as the petitioners) seeking the relief in the nature of permanent injunction to the following effect:-

^^vr% okn&i= isk dj fuosnu gS fd izfroknhx.k ds f[kykQ o oknhx.k ds i{k esa bl vej dh LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk tkjh Qjekosa fd eafnj Jh ekrkth czkã.kksth okds xzke cwfy;k ekrkth esa fcjkteku ewfrZ Jh czkã.khth ekrkth dh oknhx.k }kjk lsok iwtk o leLr vU; O;oLFkk tk;nkn eafnj o vkjkft;kr esa izfroknhx.k vFkok muds izfrfuf/k vHkh ;k Hkfo"; esa dksbZ O;o/kku u Mkys vFkok vius izfrfuf/k ls fdlh rjg dk O;o/kku Mkyus dk iz;kl u djsa rFkk oknhx.k dks ewfrZ Jh czkãk.kkstks dh lsok iwtk o cgSfl;r iqtkjh djus ns rFkk bl dk;Z ls




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top