Honble PARIHAR, J.–Since on similar set of facts, the same relief have been claimed in the above review petitions, on the request of the learned counsel for the parties both the review petitions have been heard together and been decided by this common order.

(2). The petitioners are seeking review of the order dated 21.07.1997 passed by this Court Reliance have been placed on a circular/notification issued by the State Government on 6.4.1993, by which the Member Secretary, State Law Commission, Rajasthan, Jaipur has also been added in the list of Head of Departments Class-I as appended to the Rajasthan Service Rules.

(3). There is no dispute that the petitioners were appointed purely on adhoc/temporary basis by the State Law Commission for a fixed tenure. The very nature of constitution of the State Law Commission shows that the same was constituted for a particular purpose with a fixed tenure. The State Law Commission was also given powers to recruit and appoint employees at its own convenience for the purpose of functioning of State Law Commission. There has been a clear stipulation in the letter of appointment of the petitioners also in this regard. By no stretch of imagination i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document