SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 630

KHEM CHAND SHARMA
Mukesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Upman, for Accused-Petitioner Madhav Mitra, Public Prosecutor, for State

Honble SHARMA, J.–The accused-petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 26.2.2002 passed by the Special Judge (Forged Note cases), Jaipur, by which the learned Special Judge has framed charges against the accused petitioner for offence under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 nd 323/149 IPC.

(2). In nut-shell, the prosecution case is that on the report of complainant Subhash as regards alleged murder of his son Deepak, a case vide FIR No.164/2000 was registered on 10.8.2000 at Police Station, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. Having completed investigation, a charge-sheet was submitted against accused Gulab Singh, Keshar Singh, Lokesh, Pushpendra Pareek and Ramesh Chand for offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 323 IPC, and further investigation was kept pending. These 5 accused are facing trial in Sessions Case No.1/2001.

(3). In the course of trial in Sessions Case No.1/2001, the police submitted a charge-sheet against the present petitioner and the learned trial Court after having counsel for the parties and considering the evidence and material collected during investigation and placed before it, framed charges against the accused petitioners for offence under Sections 147, 148, 302/149











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top