SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Madanlal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
(2). It arises in the following circumstances:
On 8.6.96, the petitioner Madan Lal lodged a written report with the Police Station, Raipur, Dist. Pali inter alia stating that on 4.6.96 when he was present at the first floor of his house situated on Pali road, at that time, the accused respondents Om Prakash and Madhuram came there and started throwing all the articles outside from his hut and tried to encroach on the plot of the complainant-petitioner. It was further stated in the report that accused respondent Om Prakash and Madhuram further told him that they were having patta of that plot since 1982, upon this the complainant-petitioner became suspicious about the genuineness of the patta.
(3). On this report, a case under the aforesaid Sections was registered and investigation commenced.
(4). Duri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.