N.S.HEGDE, B.P.SINGH
C. Antony – Appellant
Versus
K. G. Raghavan Nair – Respondent
(2). Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that the respondent herein on 1.11.1990 had advanced a cash sum of Rs.26,500/- for expansion of the appellants hospital and towards the repayment of the said amount, the appellant had issued a cheque for the said sum which when presented to the bank, was dishonoured with an endorsement ``Payment stopped by the drawer. The respondent after issuing the required statutory notice, filed a complaint against the appellant for offence under Section 138 of the Act, as stated above. The plea of the appellant was that no cheque was issued to the respondent nor any amount was borrow
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.