RAJESH BALIA, JAGAT SINGH
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Veer Bhan – Respondent
(2). The case of the petitioner respondent as emerging from the petition is that he was appointed on 22.11.81 by a verbal order on daily wages and since then he is discharging the duties of the clerk. He holds all the qualifications for being appointed as a Lower Divisional Clerk and at the relevant time he was working as Hindi typist an Lower Divisional Clerk. His claim is that under Rule 25(7) of the Rules of 1957 any person employed on work charged basis in P.H.E.D. and who has put in at least 2 years continuous service on 1.4.98 and has passed High School or Secondary/Praveshika Examination of Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan or of a Board recognized by the Govt. or other qualification prescrib
4. P.S.R. Motor Service vs. RTA Raipur (AIR 1966 SC 1318)
5. L. Hirday Narain vs. I.T. Commr. (AIR 1971 SC 33)
7. Delhi Administration vs. I.K. Nangiar (AIR 1979 SC 1977)
8. Supdt. Engineer Public Health vs. Kuldip Singh (AIR 1977 SC 2133)
9. Jaswant Rai vs. CBDT (AIR 1998 SC 1891)
10. E.S. Rayappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu (AIR 1974 SC 555)
12. State of Haryana vs. Piarya Singh (AIR 1992 SC 2130).–Followed.
11. Peoples Union for Democratic Rights vs. Union of India (1982) 3 SCC 235)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.