SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 797

D.N.JOSHI
Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kailash Chandra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sachin Acharya, for Petitioner Himanshu Maheshwari, for Respondent

Honble JOSHI, J.–The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer that the criminal complaint case No. 461/94 u/s 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments act, 1881 (hereinafter called as the Act) pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate No. 2. Bhilwara against the petitioner may be quashed.

(2). Heard Mr. Sachin Acharya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Himanshu Maheshwari, for the respondent.

(3). The facts giving rise to the present petition are that a complaint was filed by Ashok Kumar on 24.1.1994 before the trial Court alleging inter-alia that in pursuance to a family settlement, a cheque of Bhilwara Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. was handed over by the petitioner on 1.07.1993 amounting to Rs. 50, 000/-. It was further alleged that when the cheque was presented in the bank, it could not be honoured due to the instructions of stop payment. It was also averred in the complaint that the cheque was again presented in the bank on 7.12.1993, but the same was again dishonoured and a memo to this effect was received by the complainant on 7.12.1993 itself. Upon this, a notice dated 14.12.1993 was sent by the complainant to






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top