SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1114

KHEM CHAND SHARMA, SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Chandra Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Gupta & Vishal Bansal, for Appellants Rajendra Yadav, Public Prosecutor for State

Honble S.K. SHARMA, J.–The appellants Chandra Devi and Jai Singh were indicted before the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1 Jaipur City in Sessions Case No. 102/94. They were convicted and sentenced vide judgment dated June 3, 1996 under sections 304 B and 498A IPC to suffer imprisonment for life and also 3 years imprisonment with fine of Rs. 100/- and in default to further suffer imprisonment for 15 days. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. Against this Judgment of conviction and sentence that the action for filing the present appeal has been resorted to by the appellants.

(2). In brief the prosecution case is that Gopi Singh, (PW. 12). SHO Police Station Jhotwara recorded the Parcha Bayan (Ex.P.3) of Smt. Geeta Devi (since deceased) on August 6, 1994. Smt. Geeta Devi deposed in the Parcha Bayan that her marriage too9k place with Jai Singh some three years ago and she was issueless. After marriage Jai Singh and his younger brother Gajraj and mother in- law Chandra Devi used to harass and beat her in connection with dowry that included demand of scooter. On the day of the incident her mother-in-law addressed her as sweeper and asked her to clean latrine. When she



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top