Honble SABHARWAL, J.–The appellant has been convicted by the trial Court for wrongful confinement (Sec.346), abduction (Sec.366) and rape (Sec.376). On conviction, rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and fine of Rs.10,000/- for offence u/Sec. 376 and lesser punishments for other offences were imposed. The conviction and sentence has been maintained in appeal by the High Court in terms of the impugned judgment which is under challenge on grant of leave.

(2). The appellant at the relevant time was posted as a Constable in the Prohibition Wing of Conoor Police Station. The victim, PW- 1, was a young, recently married rustic woman. The commission of crime on the person of the victim by a Police Constable has also been fully established and is not a matter in issue. The issue that has been raised in this appeal is about the identity of the accused.

(3). The established facts are that during March 1989, PW-1, her husband (PW-2), Uncle of PW-2 (PW-4) and their other relatives pursuing the profession of lead coating to vessels/utensils, used to go from place to place for the purpose of their profession. At the relevant time, they were at Kethi in Udhagamandalam for the said pur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document