SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 878

A.C.GOYAL
Mohan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.S. Sunda & M.L. Kumawat, for Appellant Madhav Mitra, P.P., for State

Honble GOYAL, J.–This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 22.5.1999 in Sessions Case No.52/1998, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Deeg District Bharatpur held the accused appellant Mohan guilty for offence under Sections 363, 366 & 376 IPC and sentenced him t one year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default 15 days rigorous imprisonment, five years rigorous imprisonment and a sum of Rs.5000/- as fine, in default one month rigorous imprisonment and 10 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.5000/-, in default one year rigorous imprisonment under Sections 363, 366 & 376 IPC respectively. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

(2). The case of the prosecution in brief is that PW-4 Lalchand lodged a written report Ex.P.3 at Police Station Kotwali, Deeg, at 10.15 a.m. on 11.2.1998 with the averments that his niece Urmila aged 16/18 years was kidnapped today by some unknown person and the informant has got suspicion upon Mohan. Formal F.I.R. No.65/1998 Ex.P.4 under Sections 363 & 366 was registered. After usual investigation, the charge-sheet was submitted. In due course, this case came up for trial before learned Additional Ses







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top