Honble GOYAL, J.–Both the petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. are being decided vide common order as some of the facts and point of law involved are common.

(2). Briefly narrated the facts of both the petitions are as under :-

Misc. Petition No. 508/2000 :- One F.I.R. No. 6(A)/92 was registered against the accused petitioner Satish Chandra Mathur and two other accused persons namely Rameshwar and Om Prakash Gupta. After investigation, charge-sheet came to filed against Satish Chandra and Rameshwar Balai under Section 120-B IPC. read with Section 468, 467, 471 and 409 IPC and under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short the Act, 1988) for committing criminal breach of trust of a sum of Rs. 48,000/- and making false entries in the records and subsequently a sum of Rs. 24,000/- was re-deposited in loan accounts of the consumer. It was further observed by the Investigation Officer that additional charge-sheet against Om Prakash would be submitted after obtaining the sanction for prosecution.

Learned Special Judge (C.B.I. Cases), Jaipur registered the Criminal Case No. 34/1992 and framed the charges as stated hereinabove. The accused pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document