SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 201

K.S.RATHORE, ANIL DEV SINGH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Ram Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.C. Garg with Alok Garg, for Petitioners

Honble SINGH, C.J.–A criminal case was registered against the respondent under the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 (in short R.P. (U.P.) Act, 1966). He was tried in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railways), Ajmer. The case terminated in acquittal of the respondent vide order of the trial Court dated 17.7.95. It is not disputed that no departmental proceedings were initiated against the respondent in respect of the charges for which he was tried and acquitted by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railways). While acquitting the respondent, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate granted the benefit of doubt to him.

(2). After the respondent was acquitted of the charges, the appellants by an order dated 13.1.1997 promoted him to the post of Driller Gr.-I and allowed the benefit of notional fixation of pay in the promotional post w.e.f. 12.9.80, the date when his junior Shri Chandra Kishore was appointed to the post of Driller Gr.I.

(3). The respondent challenged the order before the Central Administrative Tribunal with the prayer that he should be given actual monetary and other consequential benefits of promotion with effect from 12.9.1980.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top