SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 9

M.L.JAIN
Hasina – Appellant
Versus
Manzoor Ahmad – Respondent


Advocates:
O.L. Dave, Advocate, for Petitioner;
L.K. Pandya, Advocate, for Non-petitioner;
Ayub Khan, Advocate, for Non-petitioner

tSu] lnL;-&izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh ds lEcU/k esa vizkFkhZ la- 1 }kjk izkFkfed vkifRr izLrqr dj ys[k fd;k fd mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ,oa insu lgk;d dysDVj] tks/kiqj }kjk ikfjr vknsk fuf.kZr izdj.k dh ifjHkk"kk esa ugh vkrkA vr% fuxjkuh pyus ;ksX; ugh gSA izkFkhZx.k }kjk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa /kkjk 151 tkIrk nhokuh dk izkFkZuk i= ckcr iqfyl nenkn fn;s tkus ls badkj fd;k fd og Lofoosfd; vknsk gSA jktLo e.Mys ds fu.kZ; fnukad 20-6-2002 }kjk tks vknsk fn;k x;k mlds lUnHkZ esa vLFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk izlkfjr djus dk izdj.k vHkh v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa fopkjk/khu gSA vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk ykxw djus gsrq /kkjk 151 tkIrk nhokuh ds izko/kkuksa dks ykxw djus dh dksbZ mi;ksfxrk ugh gSA jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 212 ds izko/kku ds vuqlkj bl izdkj ds vknsk fuxjkuh ;ksX; ugh gS blfy, fuxjkuh izkFkZuk i= la/kkj.k;ksX; u gksus ds dkj.k fujLr fd;k tkos ,oa bl U;k;ky; }kjk tks ,di{kh; LFkxu vknsk fnukad 5-8-2002 izlkfjr fd;k gS mls fujLr fd;k tkosA cgl ds nkSjku bl izkFkZuk i= ds leFkZu esa fo}ku odhy Jh yw.kdj.k ikf.M;k us rdZ fn;k fd ,drjQk LFkxu vknsk esa iqfyl enn dk dksbZ izko/kku ugh gSA U;k;ky; }kjk vkKkid (mandatory) LFkxu vknsk esa gh iqfyl enn nh tk ldrh gSA jktLo U;k;ky;












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top