SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 69

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Tahal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates:
B.L. Purohit, for Petitioner
Sudhir Sharma, for Respondents No. 4 and 5
Vidhya Boda, Assistant G.A.

Honble GARG, J.–This writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner against the respondents on 29.7.91 with a prayer that impugned judgment dtd. 17.2.88 (Annex. 7) passed by the Assistant Collector, Suratgarh (respondent No.3 by which the suit filed by petitioner Tahal Singh under Section 183 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 against the respondents No.4 (Pahalwan Singh) and 5 (Avtar Singh) was dismissed, judgment dtd. 8.5.91 (Annex. 8) passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority, Ajmer (respondent No.2) by which the judgment dtd. 17.2.88 (Annex. 7) passed by the Assistant Collector, Suratgarh (respondent No.3) was affirmed and the judgment dtd. 10.7.91 (Annex. 9) passed by the Board of Revenue (respondent No.1) by which the Board of Revenue upheld the judgment dtd. 8.5.91 (Annex. 8) passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority, Ajmer (respondent No.2) be quashed and set aside and the respondents No.4 (Pahalwan Singh) and 5 (Avtar Singh) be declared trespassers over the land in question.

Note : It may be stated here that during pendency of writ petition, the petitioner Tahal Singh died and therefore, his legal representative Kalu Singh















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top