SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 377

H.C.SHARMA
State – Appellant
Versus
Ramol – Respondent


Advocates:
Hagami Lal, Dy. Advocate for State
None present, for Non-Petitioner

kekZ] lnL;-&jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfue; dh /kkjk 82 ds vUrxZr ;g jsQjsUl U;k;ky; ftyk dysDVj djkSyh ds fu.kZ; fnukad 16-11-1999 }kjk jktLo e.My dks izkIr gqvk gSA

¼2½ izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd vizkFkhZ ds i{k esa mi[k.M vf/kdkjh djkSyh fnukad 22-5-1992 dks xzke djkSyh dh vkjkth [kljk ua- 2879@1 esa 278 xoZ xt flok; pd Hkwfe dks vfu;fer :i ls :ikUrfjr fd;s tkus ls vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj djkSyh us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 4-7--1955 }kjk mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ds mDr vknsk fnukad 22-5-1992 dks fujLr djus gsrq jktLo e.My dks jsQjsUl izsf"kr fd;kA jktLo e.My dh ,dy ihB us fu.kZ; fnukad 8-5-1997 }kjk fookfnr Hkwfe ij vizkFkhZ ds voS/k dCts dh vof/k ds laca/k esa iqu% tkap gsrq mDr jsQjsUl izdj.k vfrfjDr dysDVj djkSyh dks fjek.M fd;kA fjek.M ds mijkUr ftyk dysDVj djkSyh us fu.kZ; fnukad 16-11-1999 ds }kjk tkap dj ;g jsQjsUl jktLo e.My dks izsf"kr fd;k gSA

¼3½ geus fo}ku mi jktdh; vf/koDrk dh ,dyi{kh; cgl lquhA

¼4½ fo}ku mi jktdh; vf/koDrk us dFku fd;k fd mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us fooknxzLr Hkwfe ij izkFkhZ dk dksbZ iqjkuk dCtk fd;s fcuk gh vfu;fer :i ls vkoklh; iz;kstukFkZ :ikUrj.k dj fn;k gSA izdj.k esa dksbZ tkap ugh dh xbZ gSA dsoy iVokjh dh fjiksVZ ds vk/kkj ij fnukad 11-12-1992 ls pkj o"kZ iwoZ






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top