SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 317

M.L.JAIN
Faiz Mohammed – Appellant
Versus
Kashi Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K. Goyal, Advocate, for Appellant;
Brahma Nand Sharma, Advocate, for Respondent No. 1;
G.S. Lakhawat, Addl. Govt. Advocate

tSu] lnL;-&;g f}rh; vihy vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr] chdkusj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 15-6-99 ds fo:} jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 76 ds v/khu izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¼2½ izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd vihykaV [kkrsnkj }kjk fnukad 28-11-87 dks jkepUnz ds i{k esa fookfnr Hkwfe ds cspku gsrq ,d eq[R;kjukek iathc} djk;k x;kA eq[R;kj us fnukad 31-7-91 dks jsLiksMsUV la- 1 ds i{k esa fodz; i= fu"ikfnr dj iathc} djk fn;k vkSj ml vk/kkj ij rglhynkj }kjk fnukad 14-8-91 dks ukekUrjdj.k Hkh Lohd`r dj fn;k x;k ftlds fo:} vihykaV }kjk vihy izLrqr djus esa vihy Hkh [kkfjt gqbZ vkSj izdj.k esa vk;k ftldksa e.My }kjk iqu% fjek.M fd;k x;kA ftl ij rglhynkj }kjk ;g ekurs gq, vihykaV }kjk eq[R;kjukek fnukad 19-1-89 dks fujLr djk fn;k x;kA eq[R;kj dks fodz; i= fu"ikfnr djus dk vf/kdkj ugh ekurs gq, fu.kZ; fnukad 11-11-98 ikfjr fd;k fd dszrk jsLiksMsUV dkkhjke ds uke ukekUrjdj.k ntZ fd;k tkuk mfpr ugh gSA rglhynkj ds bl fu.kZ; ds fo:} vfrfjDr lEHkkxh; vk;qDr] chdkusj ds U;k;ky; esa dzsrk dkkhjke }kjk vihy dh xbZ vkSj vfrfjDr laHkkxh; vk;qDr us ;g ekuk tk ldrk D;ksafd u rks mldk vadu iwoZ eq[R;kjukek esa gS u gh mi iath;d ds ;gka ghA blfy, tks fodz; fnukad 31-7-91 dks eq[R;kj }kjk fd;k x;k og mfpr gSA ;g










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top