SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, KHEM CHAND SHARMA
Jagannath – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
U/s. 148 IPC to suffer two years R.I.
U/s. 302/149 IPC to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine to further sentence of one Year R.I.
U/s. 323/149 IPC to suffer one year R.I.
All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
(2). Briefly stated the prosecution case is that on October 1, 1995 the informant Banshi (PW. 7) and Moti (now deceased) were called by the appellants to their house to settle the boundary dispute. On hearing from Moti that question of fresh settlement did not arise as the dispute had already been resolved before the villagers, accused Ram Gopal, Ramcharan, Paras Ram, Harphool, Jagannath and Mahaveer made assault on Moti with lathies and axe. When the informant intervened he was also given beating. Hearing hue and cry when Sheonath and Jailal came, the accused fled away. Moti, in an unconsc
3. Rajeevan and Another vs. State of Kerala ((2003)3 SCC 355)
5. Deepak Kumar vs. Ravi Virmani and Another ((2002) 2 SCC 737)
6. The State of Punjab vs. Jagir Singh & Ors. ((1974) 3 SCC 277)
8. Mohar vs. State of U.P. ((2002) 7 SCC 606)–Followed.
9. Ashok Kumar Pandey vs. State of Delhi ((2002) 4 SCC 76)
10. Munshi Prasad vs. State of Bihar ((2002) 1 SCC 351)
11. Komal vs. State of U.P. ((2002) 7 SCC 82)–Followed.
12. Dharmender Singh vs. State of Gujarat ((2002) 4 SCC 679)–Followed.
13. Rizan vs. State of Chhatisgarh ((2003) 2 SCC 661)–Followed.
14. Bijoy Singh vs. State of Bihar ((2002) 9 SCC 147)–Followed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.