SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 332

N.N.MATHUR, SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Sita Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L. Garg, for accused Sita Ram K.R. Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor

Honble GARG, J.–The above-mentioned appeals and criminal revision are being decided by this common judgment as all of them arise out of common judgment and order dated 31.8.1982 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Nohar.

D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 338/82

(2). This appeal has been filed by the accused appellant Sita Ram against the judgment and order dated 31.8.1982 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nohar District Sri-Ganganagar in Sessions Case No. 31/81 by which he convicted the accused appellant Sita Ram for the offence under section 304 Part-II IPC and sentenced him to undergo six years R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo three months R.I.

(3). It may be stated here that by the same judgment, the learned Addl. Sessions Judge acquitted the present accused appellant Sita Ram as well as other accused, namely, Gangaram, Hiralal and Malluram for the offence under section 302 or 302/34 IPC.

(4). The facts giving rise to this appeal, in short, are as follows:-

On 27.10.1981 at about 9.45 PM, PW 4 Murli Dhar lodged an oral report (Ex. P/1) before PW 11 Gujai Singh, SHO, Police Station Nohar stating inter-alia that on tha




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top