SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 905

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Bhim Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kan Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. Sarupariya, for Petitioner Sanjay Mathur, for Respondent

Honble GARG, J.–This criminal misc. petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the complainant petitioner with the prayer that the impugned order dated 9.10.2002 passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nathdwara Distt. Rajsamand in criminal case No. 115/2001 by which the application of the complainant petitioner to amend the complaint filed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ``the Act of 1881) was dismissed, be quashed and set aside and the amendment application dated 5.1.2002 filed the complainant petitioner be allowed.

(2). It arises in the following circumstances:-

On 22.2.2001, a complaint under section 138 of the Act of 1881 was filed by the complainant-petitioner against the respondent in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nathdwara stating inter-alia that a cheque No. 383326 for Rs. 2 lacs was issued by the respondent in favour of the petitioner, but the said cheque was dishonoured and it was returned with the endorsement that the amount in question was not found in the account of the respondent and that information was sent by the Bank to the petitioner on 8.1.2001. Thereafter, a notice was



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top