SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 511

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Ram Pratap Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Kothari for S.G. Ojha, for Petitioner Manoj Bhandari, for Respondents

Honble GARG, J.–This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner on 4.9.1999 against the respondents with the prayer that by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 22.5.1998 (Annex. 3) passed by the respondents by which in an enquiry under Regulation 6 of the Employees (Classification, Control & Appeal) Regulations, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as ``the Regulations of 1962) after holding the petitioner guilty of supervisory negligence, punishment of withholding of two annual grade increments without cumulative effect was imposed against the petitioner and the appellate order dated 6.8.1999 (Annex. 5) passed by the Appellate Authority respondent No. 1 Secretary by which the appeal of the petitioner against the order Annex. 3 dated 22.5.1998 was dismissed, be quashed and set aside.

(2). The case of the petitioner as put forward by him in this writ petition is as follows:-

Initially, an enquiry under Regulation 7(1) of the Regulations of 1962 was initiated against the petitioner and he was served with the statement of allegations alongwith the memorandum dated 12.8.1996 (Annex. 1) and the main allegation again










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top